He showed that the molecules would collide with each other and developed the idea of the mean-free-path as a measurement of the average distance travelled by a molecule between collisions. In Clausius published a paper giving a calculation for the mean-free-path in terms of the average distance between molecules and the distance between the centres of colliding molecules at impact.
At this time the common conception had been that all the molecules in a gas travelled at the same speed but Maxwell noticed that these collisions would result in particles having different speeds. He realised that to advance in this area it was necessary to calculate the speeds of different molecules.
Maxwell achieved this by creating the formula that is now known as Maxwell's Distribution : [ It should be noted that much of this work had already been completed by J. Waterston between and but remained unnoticed until Austrian physicist, Ludwig Boltzmann subsequently modified it, in , to explain heat conduction, producing the Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution Law. This work was presented in Maxwell's paper Illustrations of the Dynamic Theory of Gases in which he also considered a combination of two types of particles and the relation needed between the average velocities for the state to be steady.
He gave calculations of the velocity, mean-free-path, and number of collisions of the molecules in the mixture at a given temperature. He also gave the first accurate expression of the pressure of a gas assuming random molecular speeds and showed it to be the same as what had previously been obtained on the assumption of uniform speeds.
This function has two parts: a normalization constant and an exponential term. The normalization constant is derived by noting that. The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution has to be normalized because it is a continuous probability distribution. As such, the sum of the probabilities for all possible values of v x must be unity. It is then more simply written. Calculating an Average from a Probability Distribution. Calculating an average for a finite set of data is fairly easy.
The average is calculated by. But how does one proceed when the set of data is infinite? Or how does one proceed when all one knows are the probabilities for each possible measured outcome?
It turns out that that is fairly simple too! This can also be extended to problems where the measurable properties are not discrete like the numbers that result from rolling a pair of dice but rather come from a continuous parent population. In this case, if the probability is of measuring a specific outcome, the average value can then be determined by. A value that is useful and will be used in further developments is the average velocity in the x direction.
This can be derived using the probability distribution, as shown in the mathematical development box above. This integral will, by necessity, be zero.
These motions will have to cancel. Since this cannot be negative, and given the symmetry of the distribution, the problem becomes.
In other words, we will consider only half of the distribution, and then double the result to account for the half we ignored. This expression indicates the average speed for motion of in one direction. However, real gas samples have molecules not only with a distribution of molecular speeds and but also a random distribution of directions. Using normal vector magnitude properties or simply using the Pythagorean Theorem , it can be seen that.
Since the direction of travel is random, the velocity can have any component in x, y, or z directions with equal probability.
As such, the average value of the x, y, or z components of velocity should be the same. And so. In a vacuum, the mean free path was very long, and the tungsten atoms quickly make their way from the filament to the inside of the bulb. Only a tiny number of the gas molecules are actually moving at the slowest and fastest speeds possible—but we know now that this small number of speedy molecules are especially important, because they are the most likely molecules to undergo a chemical reaction.
Along with these ideas, Maxwell proposed that gas particles should be treated mathematically as spheres that undergo perfectly elastic collisions. This means that the net kinetic energy of the spheres is the same before and after they collide, even if their velocities change. A major use of modern KMT is as a framework for understanding gases and predicting their behavior.
KMT links the microscopic behaviors of ideal gas molecules to the macroscopic properties of gases. In its current form, KMT makes five assumptions about ideal gas molecules:. Gases consist of many molecules in constant, random, linear motion.
Intermolecular forces are negligible. In other words, collisions between molecules are perfectly elastic. The average kinetic energy of all molecules is proportional to the absolute temperature of the gas.
This means that, at any temperature, gas molecules in equilibrium have the same average kinetic energy but NOT the same velocity and mass. These behaviors are common to all gases because of the relationships between gas pressure, volume , temperature, and amount, which are described and predicted by the gas laws for more on the gas laws , please see our Properties of Gases module.
But KMT and the gas laws are useful for understanding more than abstract ideas about chemistry. This means that if you took all the air from a fully inflated bike tire and put the air inside a much larger, empty car tire, the air would not be able to exert enough pressure to inflate the car tire. While this example about the relationship between gas volume and pressure may seem intuitive, KMT can help us understand the relationship on a molecular level. According to KMT, air pressure depends on how often and how forcefully air molecules collide with tire walls.
This means that there are fewer collisions per unit of time, which results in lower pressure and an underinflated car tire. While KMT is a useful tool for understanding the linked behaviors of molecules and matter , particularly gases, KMT does have limitations related to how its theoretical assumptions differ from the behavior of real matter.
Real gas molecules do experience intermolecular forces. As pressure on a real gas increases and forces its molecules closer together, the molecules can attract one another. This attraction slows down the molecules just a little bit before they slam into one another or the walls of a container, so that the pressure inside a container of real gas molecules is slightly lower than we would expect based on KMT.
These intermolecular forces are particularly influential when gas molecules are moving more slowly, such as at low temperature.
While growing pressure on a real gas initially allows its intermolecular forces to have more influence, a different factor gains more influence as the pressure continues to grow. While KMT assumes that gas molecules have no volume , real gas molecules do have volume. This gives a real gas greater volume at high pressure than would be predicted from KMT.
These conditions often happen at low pressure, where molecules have lots of empty space to move in, and the molecule volumes are very small compared to the total volume. And the conditions often occur at high temperature, when the molecules possess a high kinetic energy and fast speed, which lets them overcome the attractive forces between molecules. Ultimately, KMT provides assumptions about molecule behavior that can be used both as the basis for other theories about molecules, and to solve real-world problems.
0コメント